CASP6 revisited.

Author	Message
adrianxw Send message Joined: 18 Sep 05 Posts: 653 Credit: 11,840,739 RAC: 42	Message 15645 - Posted: 7 May 2006, 13:01:25 UTC I see we are crunching some of the CASP6 proteins again. I was wondering, with the improvements made in the interim, how todays Rosetta results compare to the CASP6 Rosetta at that time? Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream. ID: 15645 · Rating: 1 · rate: / Reply Quote

Snake Doctor Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 182 Credit: 6,401,938 RAC: 0	Message 15652 - Posted: 7 May 2006, 15:41:02 UTC - in response to Message 15645. Last modified: 7 May 2006, 15:42:20 UTC I see we are crunching some of the CASP6 proteins again. I was wondering, with the improvements made in the interim, how todays Rosetta results compare to the CASP6 Rosetta at that time? That would be interesting to see. It would alos be interesting to know for those predictions that were close in CASP6, how many models had to be done verses using todays Rosetta application. ID: 15652 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Cureseekers~Kristof Send message Joined: 5 Nov 05 Posts: 80 Credit: 689,603 RAC: 0	Message 15659 - Posted: 7 May 2006, 17:42:51 UTC yes, the prviouw CASP tests, Rosetta got good results, so they have to defend it. Since CASP6, the Rosetta code must have been optimized. Since we ran soome CASP6 structures again, they should have noticed better results, than 2 years ago. Let keep our fingers crossed! Member of Dutch Power Cows ID: 15659 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote