Message boards : Number crunching : How secure is my machine when running R@h?
Author | Message |
---|---|
Guilherme Silberstein Send message Joined: 8 May 20 Posts: 2 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Dear Mr Baker! Congratulations on the Fold It and R@H project! I work in a consultancy and possibly, with thousands of people working from home, there is spare computing capacity on-site the corporate world, including several of my clients which might be interested in sharing this extra capacity. Would it be possible to arrange a virtual meeting with someone from your team to understand the security of the solution as well as which are the statistics of completions of protein folding by chip type (ARM vs Intel vs AMD, etc)? How much computing power you predict is necessary or is your goal (comparing with other successfully developed proteins)? Thanks! Guilherme P.S. I´m running R@H balena install on a Raspberry 4, with 4GB RAM, seems to have taken 1 day to complete 1 of the 4 tasks. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
What are you getting at with the phrase? ...statistics of completions of protein folding by chip type The computing power is a need over the extended period of time. There is no one fixed pile of work that needs to be done. There are discoveries to be made, and you have to continue until you find them. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 7 Apr 20 Posts: 49 Credit: 797,293 RAC: 0 |
What are you getting at with the phrase? Perhaps something like this: https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/cpu_list.php or https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/apps.php ot this https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/host_stats.php |
Ray Murray Send message Joined: 22 Apr 20 Posts: 17 Credit: 270,864 RAC: 0 |
Guilherme, Is this what you're looking for? https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/cpu_list.php from the dropdowns at the top of the page Computing/Statistics/CPU models. On security; Boinc, or any other Boinc user, doesn't have access to anything on your computer. Even the information about it is limited to OS, CPU type, amount of memory, and how many and which tasks it has running or run. You can see more info on your hosts than others can see. Compare what you can see of your own with what you can see about mine. If you are worried that it will overtax your machine, you can limit the number of core assigned to Boinc. I always like to leave 1 core free, particularly when I am new to a project, so I can gauge the impact on the system without the danger of it falling over. Hope that's helpful. |
sgaboinc Send message Joined: 2 Apr 14 Posts: 282 Credit: 208,966 RAC: 0 |
it is pretty secure, i.e. only the boinc-client contact the server, not the other way round. |
mikey Send message Joined: 5 Jan 06 Posts: 1895 Credit: 9,169,305 RAC: 3,400 |
It is also important to remember that Boinc only accesses one set of Directories on your pc, nothing else, and every Project is as concerned about viruses as you and your customers are so actively check everything all the time. There are instances that a pc may flag something as 'virus like' but that's because of the way Boinc works not that it's an actual virus. The way around those false positives is to exclude the Boinc directories from your a/v scanner, any REAL virus will try and get to other directories on the pc and get caught by your a/v while any false positives within the Boinc directories will be ignored. Boinc sends info back and forth to the same Project IP address all the time, the Heuristic way of scanning can sometimes see that as 'virus like' as someplace collecting your data and flag it. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
One method to assure that a BOINC project cannot modify anything outside of the scope of the project on your machine is to run BOINC in a sandbox. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
William Albert Send message Joined: 22 Mar 20 Posts: 23 Credit: 1,069,070 RAC: 99 |
One method to assure that a BOINC project cannot modify anything outside of the scope of the project on your machine is to run BOINC in a sandbox. While account sandboxing is a great feature, and can be used without downsides on most platforms, it should be noted that sandboxing on Windows prevents BOINC from using the GPU. |
sgaboinc Send message Joined: 2 Apr 14 Posts: 282 Credit: 208,966 RAC: 0 |
imho actually it is easier to be hit by a virus / spyware / tracker simply surfing the web with a web browser than running r@h. javascript is deemed a 'attack surface' with no url boundaries with cross site scripting |
Guilherme Silberstein Send message Joined: 8 May 20 Posts: 2 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Thanks to all that responded! Is anyone aware of companies that install BOINC to run R@H out of office hours in their main office desktops or data-centers spare capacity? or, as the name would say, this is only meant for home usage? Best Regards, Guilherme |
William Albert Send message Joined: 22 Mar 20 Posts: 23 Credit: 1,069,070 RAC: 99 |
Is anyone aware of companies that install BOINC to run R@H out of office hours in their main office desktops or data-centers spare capacity? or, as the name would say, this is only meant for home usage? We utilize some of our otherwise-unused data center capacity for BOINC projects like Rosetta, but machines used for this purpose are dedicated toward it; we don't mix BOINC and non-BOINC workloads on the same machine. We also take other hardening steps, like secure erasing disks before being used in machines that run BOINC, and keeping BOINC machines outside of our internal production networks. That being said, I wouldn't recommend using shared office PCs for BOINC, for security and performance reasons. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1681 Credit: 17,854,150 RAC: 20,118 |
or, as the name would say, this is only meant for home usage?It's for any one, home or business, to use. Grant Darwin NT |
Ace Casino Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 18 Credit: 14,027,021 RAC: 11,595 |
At least one person used a whole school district. Just ask NEZ from SETI@home......lol.....can't stop laughing! |
mikey Send message Joined: 5 Jan 06 Posts: 1895 Credit: 9,169,305 RAC: 3,400 |
Thanks to all that responded! My former employer who had over 10k pc's was working on using a sandboxing method of running Boinc but the local power company offered to pay them to shut down the machines at night instead of expanding their power generation efforts so it never happened. The basic ideas was that at 8pm, after 99% of employees were gone, the pc would pop up a message saying 'if you don't want the machine to reboot click the mouse or keyboard within 60 seconds', if no one clicked anything then the machine would auto reboot into a sandboxed setup for Boinc, it would be get a unit, finish it and get another unit, no cache at all. Then at around 4 am it would stop getting new tasks and once it recognized it was no longer crunching it would reboot back to the normal everyday screen for the users to do their daily work. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
How secure is my machine when running R@h?
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org