So I have graphed the last year and a bit of Rosetta's status page.

You can access it here: https://munin.kiska.pw/munin/rosetta-week.html

One interesting graph here:


And you're more than welcome to ask me to add something

Finally! A "hockey stick" graph that shows something good!

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

Finally! A "hockey stick" graph that shows something good!

You're welcome :D

Or this one :D

Finally! A "hockey stick" graph that shows something good!

You're welcome :D

Or this one :D

Yeah. It got up there for a while, then ran out of work to send.

---

Grant
Darwin NT

And the in progress jobs keeps falling :D

Now that they increased the default WU duration, I'd expect to see a decrease in the number of WU being sent back, but an ever increasing RAC as each WU will return more decoys than before,

---

Indeed, this is what should happen, but if the credits weirdness is fixed

---

Now that they increased the default WU duration,

It was only for a short time, it's back to 8 hours again.

I'd expect to see a decrease in the number of WU being sent back, but an ever increasing RAC as each WU will return more decoys than before,

Not if the Credit function is working properly. Credit should be paid for the number of FLOPs (Floating Point operations per second) done for Valid work, not the number of Decoys done- as they vary depending on the type of data being processed.
Only a more efficient application should result in increased Credit per hour for a given system. ie- more work (FLOPs) is done per hour.

The first batch of work i got with the new application was actually resulting in less Credit per Task. Will have to see how things go when processing resends.

---

Grant
Darwin NT