3 hour result v 24 hour result

Message boards : Number crunching : 3 hour result v 24 hour result

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Betting Slip

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 05
Posts: 71
Credit: 5,702,246
RAC: 0
Message 74248 - Posted: 11 Nov 2012, 8:30:37 UTC
Last modified: 11 Nov 2012, 8:40:54 UTC

I would just like to know if there is any scientific benefit to crunch a WU for 24hrs?

I ask because of this result where a WU was resent but the original WU was returned after 3hrs of processing (over a 10 day period) and was tagged as "canonical" .

Does this mean my 24hr processing of this WU is wasted and binned or is it used because of the longer processing?
ID: 74248 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Link
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 May 07
Posts: 356
Credit: 382,349
RAC: 0
Message 74249 - Posted: 11 Nov 2012, 9:12:25 UTC - in response to Message 74248.  

I would just like to know if there is any scientific benefit to crunch a WU for 24hrs?

I ask because of this result where a WU was resent but the original WU was returned after 3hrs of processing (over a 10 day period) and was tagged as "canonical" .

Does this mean my 24hr processing of this WU is wasted and binned or is it used because of the longer processing?

There's not so much scientific benefit, the benefit is that you decrease the load on the download servers (which is good for the project) and if your internet connection is somehow limited or just slow, it might be good for you.

As to the canonical result... I think (and hope) that that is just the only thing BOINC can do/show while actually both your results were entered in the database, since they validated and were probably completely different anyway (starting structures are generated locally).
.
ID: 74249 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : 3 hour result v 24 hour result



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org