Message boards : Number crunching : Statistics consultation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Trotador Send message Joined: 30 May 09 Posts: 108 Credit: 291,214,977 RAC: 2 |
Hi, I've noted that Rosetta's statistics pages do not allow selecting validated, in progress, errored or pending validation tasks as in other BOINC projects. Is it on purpose? Could it be added? I think it would be a very useful tool to review and check how everything goes. Sorry if the answer is already available somewhere but I did not manage to find it. regards, |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2117 Credit: 41,159,890 RAC: 15,363 |
Click on your name in this thread, click again on the word "View" alongside your computers, then click "Results" against each computer you have. I notice you have quite a few Client Errors. If you click on the "Task ID" you'll see the output file and can usually work out what caused the error. Why the error was caused is another matter. You'll rarely find tasks pending validations as they're usually dealt with just a few minutes after upload, but if there are any they'll be listed in your results screen too. |
Trotador Send message Joined: 30 May 09 Posts: 108 Credit: 291,214,977 RAC: 2 |
Yes the reason of my post is to investigate those errors but i still can't get to show just tasks with errors in one page and i have to browse through all pages to find the ones that errored which is rather unconfortable you know. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
The views you describe are incorporated in to BOINC server code at a version that is newer then is currently installed at Rosetta@home. So, it's not that anything was disabled here. It is just that when the server was last upgraded, this feature was not yet available. ...and before you say "then upgrade the server", please keep in mind that it isn't simply a matter of click a button and your server is upgraded. All of the customizations for Rosetta@home have to be manually incorporated into any new release. And every time you do that, you risk error. So upgrades tend to be minimized as much as possible. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2117 Credit: 41,159,890 RAC: 15,363 |
Yes the reason of my post is to investigate those errors but I still can't get to show just tasks with errors in one page and I have to browse through all pages to find the ones that errored which is rather uncomfortable you know. I misunderstood your question first time round, sorry. Still, it only took me two minutes to review all your tasks and you only need to check out the newer tasks each day. The results page only seems to show the last 7 days (or so) reported so it'll never become that long a list. |
Trotador Send message Joined: 30 May 09 Posts: 108 Credit: 291,214,977 RAC: 2 |
Yes, as simple as that..., well I've done it and the summary is below. Two type of errors, one that made fail all replicas, not only mine, and seem related with messing during the compression of the file while the second one on the other hand seems well related to one of my machines and read as "access violation" to certain addresses Any advise on what look in my hardware/software configuration will be much appreciated. It is a Q9400@3,2 GHz, XP 32 bits SP3, first idea is try to give the cPU/memory more voltage it it could be hardware related and or look for memory modules failures. Task ID 323751279 Name t300__boinc_filtered_loopbuild_threading_cst_lb_tex_IGNORE_THE_REST_16900_8712_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x008D8D30 write attempt to address 0x00000000 Task ID 323511118 Name ina2inaN_to_NOE__18638_4331_0 Task ID 323295986 Name abinitio_withrelax_nodisulf_nohomfrag_cst0.01_129_B_1louA_SAVE_ALL_OUT_17407_1802_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x006E8DA1 write attempt to address 0x9503C59E Task ID 324064377 Name quota_6_1tif__BOINC_abrelax.v1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_18319_981_0 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out Task ID 324064378 Name abinitio_withrelax_nodisulf_nohomfrag_nonative_cst0.1_129_B_1srrA_SAVE_ALL_OUT_17951_329_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x44F58BC9 read attempt to address 0x44F58BC9 Task ID 324064382 Name quota_6_rama_1tul__BOINC_abrelax.v1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_18320_986_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0xE046DBD0 read attempt to address 0xE046DBD0 Task ID 324064394 Name Rossmann3x3_abinitio_SAVE_ALL_OUT_design_k019_003_18632_1842_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x0067E0E8 read attempt to address 0x00000008 Task ID 324245070 -**** Name gunn_fragments_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1wtyA__18642_1703_0 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out Task ID 324254752 Name gunn_fragments_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1npuA__18642_441_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x004C8C76 read attempt to address 0x00000010 Task ID 324254851 Name tyrsim_3gbn_1tyj_Protein_interface_design_25Feb2010_18415_595_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x00A93166 read attempt to address 0x7B806820 Task ID 324254855 Name t382__boinc_filtered_loopbuild_threading_cst_all_tex_IGNORE_THE_REST_16902_9038_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0xE046A510 read attempt to address 0xE046A510 Task ID 324276886-**** Name gunn_fragments_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1wtyA__18642_1755_0 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out Task ID 324497156 Name lr5_dun08_slow_corrections_it03_A_rlbd_1bm8_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_DECOY_18090_1175_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0xE044EDF0 read attempt to address 0xE044EDF0 Task ID 324500366 Name quota_6_rama_1bk2__BOINC_abrelax.v1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_18320_1143_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x008D8B30 read attempt to address 0x0EDC5040 Task ID 324903954 Name lr5_combined_torsion_it01_run01_A_rlbn_1a32_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_NATIVE_NOCON_18670_31_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0xE059E0B0 read attempt to address 0xE059E0B0 Task ID 324905512 Name Rossmann3x3_abinitio_SAVE_ALL_OUT_design_k023_004_18666_837_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x006E8DA1 write attempt to address 0x8BFC718F Task ID 325023482 Name lr5_combined_torsion_it01_run01_A_rlbd_2vik_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_DECOY_18669_634_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x008D8D30 write attempt to address 0x00000000 Task ID 325163896 Name lr5_combined_torsion_it01_run01_A_rlbd_2i9c_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_DECOY_18669_1118_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0xE044EDF0 read attempt to address 0xE044EDF0 Task ID 325248616 Name t362__boinc_filtered_loopbuild_threading_cst_lb_tex_IGNORE_THE_REST_16900_9623_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0xE046DBD0 read attempt to address 0xE046DBD0 Task ID 325288480 Name gunn_fragments_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-1vls___18642_1284_0 Task ID 325288481 Name gunn_fragments_SAVE_ALL_OUT_-2hnfA__18642_1172_0 Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x006E8DA1 write attempt to address 0xA14A60EC |
Trotador Send message Joined: 30 May 09 Posts: 108 Credit: 291,214,977 RAC: 2 |
I'm starting with a HD defragmentation regards |
dcdc Send message Joined: 3 Nov 05 Posts: 1831 Credit: 119,526,853 RAC: 9,592 |
0xc0000005 might be due to a faulty driver but I'd try testing your RAM and PSU first (testing a PSU isn't easy though). If you haven't already, try memtest x86+: http://www.memtest.org/#downiso and Prime95 (I usually try both the 2nd (max heat, power etc) and 3rd (blend) options: http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft/ (the download link is under step 3 - ignore the rest!) |
Trotador Send message Joined: 30 May 09 Posts: 108 Credit: 291,214,977 RAC: 2 |
Yes prime95 and linx were used to test stability under heavy CPU/memory load. I've finished defragmentation, let's how it behaves in the next hours. regards, |
Trotador Send message Joined: 30 May 09 Posts: 108 Credit: 291,214,977 RAC: 2 |
Yes prime95 and linx were used to test stability under heavy CPU/memory load. Desfragmentation did not did it. Another one errored. Upping voltages. regards |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2117 Credit: 41,159,890 RAC: 15,363 |
Any advise on what look in my hardware/software configuration will be much appreciated. Unfortunately nothing that's sure to solve the problem. But when I see problems on machines that run perfectly on other machines I update my software to the latest stable version and look to uninstall any program that I don't use, in case there are unexpected conflicts. I notice you use Boinc 6.2.28 when the latest is 6.10.18. Update this, then use Windows update, then something like Filehippo Update checker and perhaps run Secunia Software Inspector. A full virus and malware scan may also be useful and finally chkdsk. If you're feeling adventurous you can review your startup programs and active services as well. This may not solve the problem, but it will ensure you have a secure baseline machine. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Statistics consultation
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org