Message boards : Number crunching : Newbie Q&A, if you're new, have a view!
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 8 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
j2satx Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 97 Credit: 3,670,592 RAC: 0 |
Thanks. You accidentally left out the "C" in boinCstats.com. I changed my resource share at http://boincstats.boincstats.com/bam/resources.php, but Einstein gave an incorrect response and WCG gave no response. So I went to http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/home.php and changed Einstein's resource as you had explained for Rosetta. It worked. I can't figure out how to change the resource number for WCG though. Maybe I have it setup wrong or have to wait until I have some work done and get credit. Any ideas? Edit: I changed the resources so that I got the percents I wanted while leaving WCG at 100. In WCG, go to My Grid, Device Manager, Device Profiles........if you have more than one profile, you'll need to edit each one. |
dennisshows Send message Joined: 6 Jan 08 Posts: 3 Credit: 858,641 RAC: 0 |
Thanks again. I think WCG used to use their own client, but they have switched to Boinc. As a matter of fact, I got my Boinc client from them. Maybe they don't have everything setup yet. Edit: Thanks, j2satx. On my home PC Boinc has Einstein showing work done as 473.69, but I know the recent work was done on my work PC. Is their something I need to do to get my work machines' numbers to report on Boincstats.com? Cross Project ID? |
Dusty Send message Joined: 1 Mar 08 Posts: 41 Credit: 2,667,354 RAC: 0 |
I've gone through the entire "Newbie Q&A," but I didn't find this question asked: What are the optimum CMOS settings to maximize System/CPU/Memory efficiency for Rosetta WITHOUT overclocking? For example, my Mobo has the option for "virtualization technology." Does having this enabled help or hurt Rosetta performance? I'd like to tweak my CMOS and reboot, but because it's running 8 processes at once, I always lose credit for several of the processes because they aren't far enough along to remember how far I've gotten, and they start back at zero. It would be nice if these 'markers' were more frequent. I know I'm asking a lot, but making this thread just about efficiency and not about overclocking would make it really useful for me, since I tend to just go with the default settings and don't know if it's hurting me. |
joseps Send message Joined: 25 Jun 06 Posts: 72 Credit: 8,173,820 RAC: 0 |
How can I avoid "Client error" or what causes it? Another problem is "Validate error". Have I done something wrong to cause these 2 issues? I am just curious. I find these comments under "Tasks for user". Hope someone can explain it to me. Thanks a lot. joseps I turned off my 5computers when I went on vacation. When I return today, I can not upload work. Need work units to run computers. joseps |
Feet1st Send message Joined: 30 Dec 05 Posts: 1755 Credit: 4,690,520 RAC: 0 |
joseps, unless your client errors are download errors, which might indicate a better internet connection would be helpful, there isn't really anything you can do on your side to resolve these issues. Add this signature to your EMail: Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might! https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/ |
Feet1st Send message Joined: 30 Dec 05 Posts: 1755 Credit: 4,690,520 RAC: 0 |
Mark, RE: your question about CMOS settings. I'm sorry, I have no idea, so that is why I've not responded. I've seen similar topics that an entire thread on their own with various processor manufacturers and memory configurations possible. So perhaps starting a new thread describing the specifics would bring about an answer for you. Add this signature to your EMail: Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might! https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/ |
tmkramer Send message Joined: 3 Aug 08 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,322,467 RAC: 0 |
This machine (PowerBook G4) seems to have trouble getting work. My other machine G4 iMac doesn't seem to have any trouble. This is message is typical:
I have noodled around the faq but not found this particular topic (no work sent / was work for other platforms) explained. =Tom |
fa13160 Send message Joined: 2 Aug 08 Posts: 1 Credit: 19,100 RAC: 0 |
This machine (PowerBook G4) seems to have trouble getting work. My other machine G4 iMac doesn't seem to have any trouble. This is message is typical: My old G3/900Mhz is also being snubbed in this manner, though my new iMac is having no employment problem. I've let it (the G3) sit, idle, for lengthy periods awaiting work. I did manage on occasion to force the issue by "resetting" the project and then doing an "update." Have I done any harm? This machine is always on, and I'm sure it would like be productive and have a purpose. Any advice would be appreciated. |
Snags Send message Joined: 22 Feb 07 Posts: 198 Credit: 2,888,320 RAC: 0 |
This machine (PowerBook G4) seems to have trouble getting work. My other machine G4 iMac doesn't seem to have any trouble. This is message is typical: My ppc Mac also gets this message occasionally. I believe the message appears when there are only minirosetta tasks available. Since no mini app was written for ppc macs we have to wait until more version 5.98 tasks are created. And since all the other computers that can run minirosetta can also run 5.98 (and are probably faster and asking for more work on each, possibly more frequent, connection) we are sometimes simply going to miss out. I've got three practical suggestions, no resetting required: If you still have work on board lengthen your preferred runtime. Make the change on the website, hit update in BOINC manager and the change will be applied to all the tasks on hand. If you do have a lot of tasks on hand make sure you keep the deadlines in mind when deciding how much to increase the runtime. On the version of BOINC that I am running (5.10.45) the "work for other platforms" message results in a 24 hour backoff but there is no need to wait that long. Simply hitting update will result in another request for work. If there is still no work you will see another 24 hour backoff. I'm not suggesting you sit there hitting the update button all day, just that if you find yourself 6 or 12 hours into a backoff period, hitting update might prove fruitful. Attach to second project. If Rosetta is your true love you can set your resource shares accordingly and the secondary project will kick in when requests to Rosetta can't be met. If you are interested in health related production projects check out the dengue drugs project on World Community Grid. Hope this helps. Snags |
Richard Send message Joined: 9 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 86 RAC: 0 |
I have 3 problems: 1. All the wu's presently showing on my task page on Rosetta@home do not show on my BOINC manager. 2. All the wu's presently showing on my BOINCE manager are not showing on my Rosetta@home task page. 3. Rosetta says I have had no activity or update since 24 Aug. Credit shows 86 and it should be 250+ and going up each day. What the heck is going on around here? |
tmkramer Send message Joined: 3 Aug 08 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,322,467 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for the advice, I have added another project, but I confess that I like the graphics on Rosetta@home. Now none of my g4 machines have Rosetta tasks. Intel machines don't seem to have a lack of tasks. I guess that my slower machine takes longer to go through its tasks and by the time it needed tasks, they were available. =Tom This machine (PowerBook G4) seems to have trouble getting work. My other machine G4 iMac doesn't seem to have any trouble. This is message is typical: |
Richard Send message Joined: 9 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 86 RAC: 0 |
Apparently Rosetta hasn't had an xml update since 24 August. That's the last time my stats were updated. No Rosetta wu's are showing on my tasks list on this site. When is someone going to pay attention around here. How about some kind of answer instead of nothing....I have heard Rosetta is notorius for ignoring people. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Richard, please review the details in this thread and see if your machine is requesting any work. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Richard Send message Joined: 9 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 86 RAC: 0 |
Richard, please review the details in this thread and see if your machine is requesting any work. I have plenty of work on my machine. I just added more today. Work is not the issue whatsoever. The issue is that Rosetta has 9 wu's (in red) that shouldn't be in my qeue. It should show about 35 wu's. My stats page has me at 86 credits whereas on BOINCSTATS I have nearly 300 with a RAC of 16. My BOINC manager says the same thing. Rosetta stats page says my last update was 24 August. Rosetta homepage for all my stats is wrong and has been for nearly 10 days. |
Richard Send message Joined: 9 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 86 RAC: 0 |
Richard, please review the details in this thread and see if your machine is requesting any work. ...My BOINC manager says "no work sent" even though I just received 14 wu's. Something is definitely wrong on Rosetta since BOINCSTATS & my BOINC manager have the correct numbers for my stats. |
Richard Send message Joined: 9 Aug 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 86 RAC: 0 |
Richard, please review the details in this thread and see if your machine is requesting any work. ...Maybe I need to re-attach to Rosetta through my BOINC manager? As far as I can see this is an issue with Rosetta. |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Richard, see my reply in the thread you opened. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Zen Send message Joined: 23 Jul 08 Posts: 1 Credit: 271,361 RAC: 0 |
Greetings, I'm currently having an issue with some 5.98 and Mini 1.32 tasks. The tasks are usually slated to complete in under 3 hours. They run merrily along and then when they hit about 9 minutes and 50 seconds left until completion, they virtually stop running. They begin to process .001 or .002% every 10 to 15 seconds. The file will eventually end up completing in 7-9 hours of total run time. Is this a flaw? Should I abort these units or let them run? By the way, I have encountered the same problem on three different computers. Regards, Zen |
Evan Send message Joined: 23 Dec 05 Posts: 268 Credit: 402,585 RAC: 0 |
I'm currently having an issue with some 5.98 and Mini 1.32 tasks. The tasks are usually slated to complete in under 3 hours. They run merrily along and then when they hit about 9 minutes and 50 seconds left until completion, they virtually stop running. Some of the recent models have been very large and do indeed take a long time. The behaviour you have noticed is normal. At least one model must be completed even if it exceeds your time limit. Once a model is completed the Boinc manager looks to see if it can complete another model within your three hours. If it can, it continues but if not, it uploads and starts another work unit. Myself I have recently had models in the 5-7 hour range. Look carefully at the graphics and you will see the occasional movement. |
Mild Mannered Professor Send message Joined: 17 Aug 06 Posts: 3 Credit: 2,507,122 RAC: 0 |
This machine (PowerBook G4) seems to have trouble getting work. My other machine G4 iMac doesn't seem to have any trouble. This is message is typical: |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Newbie Q&A, if you're new, have a view!
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org